Writing Outcomes


Student Samples | Syllabi | Assignments | Resources | CONNECT Information Literacy

Home

About

Course Design

Community

CONNECT Conference

Interview Videos

Resources

How to Use
This Site

Contact

The Connect First-Year Writing Group examined course descriptions, objectives and handbooks and vetted documents from the five institutions and created a grid of performance indicators for students in first-year composition. They presented this work and field-tested it at the Second Annual Assessment Conference, sponsored by The New England Association of Schools and Colleges, on April 15, 2005.
 
Later that year, the grid then became a basis of discussion at The First Annual First-Year Writing Conference sponsored by Connect and held at Bristol Community College. Conference participants demonstrated a high level of inter-rater reliability as they worked through a stack of sample essays and scored them according to the Connect grid.
 
The grid has been presented as a model of cooperative writing and assessment at the 2006 and 2007 Conferences on College Composition and Communication. This exercise may be seen as a first step toward establishing a system of valid, comprehensive writing assessment at the six Connect schools.


CONNECT Writing Outcomes and Rubric

Printable Writing Outcomes Rubric in pdf

 

Writing:

Students will move through the processes of writing: inventing, composing, and revising, culminating in editing according to the conventions of Standard Written English.

 

Critical reading: Students will critically read and respond to a variety of texts by summarizing, paraphrasing, analyzing, synthesizing, and critiquing,

Audience, purpose, voice: Students will compose a rhetorically effective text in a voice appropriate to the audience and the purpose of the writing.

Thesis development:

Students will formulate an effective thesis and support it with evidence.

 

Organization: Students will compose coherent and cohesive essays and other texts.

 

Research and information literacy: Students will locate, evaluate, synthesize, and document primary and/or secondary source materials to support a position.

Expert

Writing is polished and insightful, demonstrating a synthesis of the writing process. Text contains few or if any errors in Standard Written English.

 

Writing engages fully with the text, demonstrating developed inferential and evaluative skills.

Writing demonstrates a clear sense of audience and effectively fulfills the writer’s purpose. Voice is distinctive; vocabulary is aptly chosen, lively, and sophisticated.

Thesis is clear, thought-provoking, and well focused, supported by vivid and concrete evidence.

Writing demonstrates a logical and clear structure, incorporating graceful transitions and unified paragraphs.

Primary and/or secondary sources are skillfully interwoven into the text to support the thesis. Research is thorough, and sources are correctly cited.

Practitioner

Though competent, writing could improve from better application of one or two steps of the writing process. Text contains some errors in Standard Written English.

Writing shows adequate comprehension and some inferential ability; writing shows an ability to engage with the text.

Writing demonstrates a basic awareness of audience and generally fulfills writer’s purpose; tone, diction, and vocabulary are functional and appropriate

Thesis is clear and substantially supported by evidence in a straightforward though perhaps mechanical way.

Writing shows a basic sense of beginning, middle, and end; a functional introduction, body, and conclusion; and, for the most part, focused and orderly paragraphs.

Most sources are appropriate and correctly documented.  Research is sufficient to the assignment and adequately integrated.

Novice

Writing shows little change from invention to final draft, despite consistent problems with content and/or Standard Written English.

Writing demonstrates little comprehension of relevant texts, limited inferential skills, and a lack of awareness of authorial bias.

Writing demonstrates lack of awareness of audience and does not fulfill writer’s purpose; voice is inappropriate as demonstrated by tone, diction, and vocabulary.

Writing exhibits no central thesis or exhibits a discontinuity between thesis and supporting evidence, or insufficient supporting evidence.

Introduction, body, and/or conclusion are unfocused or absent; ideas may be arranged illogically.

Writing demonstrates inappropriate use or lack of sources, faulty integration of researched materials, and/or incorrect or absent documentation.